|
Mar 10
2010
|
Chuck Donovan on Pelosi and Reid's "Piecrust Promise"Posted by: Thomas Peters in APP Blog Tagged in: upper chamber , parliamentary procedure , nancy pelosi , lower chamber , health care , harry reid , abortion
|
|

A memory of history should provide wisdom to help decide what should be done next in the health care debate:
A piecrust promise is one that is easily made and easily broken. The promise – more a rumor than anything else – that the U.S. Senate will use the reconciliation process to adopt a strong ban on abortion funding if the House passes the Senate-approved bill is flakier than most. Never before in the history of the 34-year abortion funding debate have pro-life members of Congress approved a bill containing abortion funding on the promise that a subsequent vote will fix the problem.
... pro-life House Democrats have no reason to believe that the “reconciliation fix” on abortion is anything more than a piecrust promise. If they were to proceed anyway and vote for H.R. 3590, it would indeed be “career-defining” for these House members who have so far stood tall for their, and their constituents’, convictions. (Chuck Donovan at The Foundry)




